Short answer: yes, but not for the reason it used to.
The old thinking was: Leaving `alt=""` on meaningful images purely out of habit — empty alt text should be reserved for genuinely decorative images only. That framing is dated — search engines have gotten much better at figuring things out without hand-holding. But 'search engines can cope without it' isn't the same as 'it doesn't matter.'
What actually changed is who benefits. Check image URLs after any CDN migration or hosting change — this is the single most common cause of sitewide broken images. That's less about appeasing an algorithm and more about not wasting the crawl/attention you already have.
The practical test isn't whether it's trendy — it's whether skipping it creates work for someone else later (a crawler, a future you, a user). By that test, broken image links still earns its place.
Same question, different tool: does 301 redirect chains still matter?
Image URL Checker either way — checking takes longer to read about than to do.
Everything in this guide runs directly in your browser — no signup, no install.
Open Image URL Checker →